A focused view of the Commercial · MT South team's performance across Cycle 25-26 — individual results,
competency profiles, and how the team positions relative to the broader PI AgSciences Brazil benchmark.
3
Team members
3.58
Department mean
4.00
Top rating
1
Sub-regions
01 · Department Overview
Commercial at a glance.
How the team is delivering across Cycle 25-26 — the shape of performance, the strongest competencies,
and how the department positions in the broader company context.
Department mean
3.58/ 5.00
σ = 0.36 · n = 3
Exceeds (≥4.0)
1
Top-quartile contributors
Meets (3.0–4.0)
2
Solid delivery backbone
Positioning
103.2%
of company mean · at company pace
Where Commercial sits vs. the company
Visual comparison of average Overall rating. Each dot is anonymized — no individual comparison, just the team's general position.
1.02.03.04.05.0
Company 3.47
Commercial 3.58
BuildingApproachingMeetingExceeding
Overall Rating distribution
Where Commercial team members land on the rating scale.
0
0.0
0
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.5
0
2.0
0
2.5
2
3.0
0
3.5
1
4.0
0
4.5
Competency strengths
Commercial profile ranked from strongest to weakest competency.
01
Teamwork
Dept
4.00
Company
3.72
108% of company
02
Customer Service
Dept
3.67
Company
3.64
101% of company
03
Adaptability
Dept
3.67
Company
3.59
102% of company
04
Communications
Dept
3.33
Company
3.28
102% of company
05
Planning & Organization
Dept
3.33
Company
3.56
94% of company
06
Problem Solving
Dept
3.00
Company
3.64
82% of company
02 · Team
Every review, one card.
Click any card for the full profile — competencies, goals, job duties, narrative comments, and general information including current compensation.
JN
Jean Michel Nascimento
STR
Commercial · MT South
TOP IN DEPT
4.00
4.67 G4.00 JD3.67 C
115% of company mean
CS
Caio Fernando Queiroz Da Silva
STR
Commercial · MT South
3.42
4.00 G3.00 JD3.33 C
98% of company mean
CF
Ciro Branco de Miranda Filho
STR
Commercial · MT South
3.33
3.33 G3.00 JD3.50 C
96% of company mean
03 · Positioning
How each team member sits in context.
For each person: where they land on the 1–5 rating scale, with reference lines for
Commercial mean (solid colored line) and Company mean (dashed grey).
The % value shows proximity to the company average — not a ranking. The goal is context, not competition.
Commercial mean (3.58)
Company mean (3.47)
Individual rating
JN
Jean Michel Nascimento
STR
4.00
115%
of company avg
CS
Caio Fernando Queiroz Da Silva
STR
3.42
98%
of company avg
CF
Ciro Branco de Miranda Filho
STR
3.33
96%
of company avg
💡 How to read this
A proximity of 100% means the person is right at the company average. Above 100% indicates delivery above the company-wide benchmark, below 100% indicates ratings below it. This is not a judgment — it is calibration context. The distribution of the Commercial team naturally produces a mix above and below the company mean.
04 · Salary Adjustments
Salary adjustments for Cycle 26-27.
2 of the 3 team members in MT South received an approved salary increase for the next cycle. Only those with adjustments are shown here.
Receiving an increase
1
Total current
R$ 180.000
Total proposed
R$ 192.000
Total increase
+R$ 12.000
CS
Caio Fernando Queiroz Da Silva
STR
Current: R$ 180.000
Proposed: R$ 192.000
+6.7%
+R$ 12.000
JN
Jean Michel Nascimento
STR
Current: R$ 192.000
Proposed: R$ 216.000
+12.5%
+R$ 24.000
05 · Action Plan
Development action plans.
Track development actions for each team member using the Start / Stop / Continue framework.
Each item captures what needs to happen, how it will be done,
and a due date. Click any card to expand and add items.